mirror of
https://github.com/CHN-beta/nixpkgs.git
synced 2026-01-11 18:32:23 +08:00
ci/github-script/commits: block on errors
Most of the checks we do for cherry-picks are dismissable warnings, with
one exception: When a commit hash has been found, but this hash is not
available in any of the pickable branches, we raise this with
severity=error. This should also *block* the merge and not be
dismissable. That's because this is a fixable issue in every case.
(cherry picked from commit 1fbcad0434)
This commit is contained in:
committed by
github-actions[bot]
parent
e2ac5f530c
commit
ca425fc98d
78
.github/workflows/check.yml
vendored
78
.github/workflows/check.yml
vendored
@@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ jobs:
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Check cherry-picks
|
||||
id: check
|
||||
continue-on-error: true
|
||||
uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
|
||||
with:
|
||||
script: |
|
||||
@@ -63,84 +62,9 @@ jobs:
|
||||
github,
|
||||
context,
|
||||
core,
|
||||
dry: context.eventName == 'pull_request',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Request changes
|
||||
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && steps.check.outcome == 'failure' }}
|
||||
uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
|
||||
with:
|
||||
script: |
|
||||
const { readFile } = require('node:fs/promises')
|
||||
const body = await readFile('review.md', 'utf-8')
|
||||
|
||||
const pendingReview = (await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
|
||||
owner: context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: context.repo.repo,
|
||||
pull_number: context.payload.pull_request.number
|
||||
})).find(review =>
|
||||
review.user.login == 'github-actions[bot]' && (
|
||||
// If a review is still pending, we can just update this instead
|
||||
// of posting a new one.
|
||||
review.state == 'CHANGES_REQUESTED' ||
|
||||
// No need to post a new review, if an older one with the exact
|
||||
// same content had already been dismissed.
|
||||
review.body == body
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// Either of those two requests could fail for very long comments. This can only happen
|
||||
// with multiple commits all hitting the truncation limit for the diff. If you ever hit
|
||||
// this case, consider just splitting up those commits into multiple PRs.
|
||||
if (pendingReview) {
|
||||
await github.rest.pulls.updateReview({
|
||||
owner: context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: context.repo.repo,
|
||||
pull_number: context.payload.pull_request.number,
|
||||
review_id: pendingReview.id,
|
||||
body
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
|
||||
owner: context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: context.repo.repo,
|
||||
pull_number: context.payload.pull_request.number,
|
||||
event: 'REQUEST_CHANGES',
|
||||
body
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Dismiss old reviews
|
||||
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' && steps.check.outcome == 'success' }}
|
||||
uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
|
||||
with:
|
||||
script: |
|
||||
await Promise.all(
|
||||
(await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
|
||||
owner: context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: context.repo.repo,
|
||||
pull_number: context.payload.pull_request.number
|
||||
})).filter(review =>
|
||||
review.user.login == 'github-actions[bot]'
|
||||
).map(async (review) => {
|
||||
if (review.state == 'CHANGES_REQUESTED') {
|
||||
await github.rest.pulls.dismissReview({
|
||||
owner: context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: context.repo.repo,
|
||||
pull_number: context.payload.pull_request.number,
|
||||
review_id: review.id,
|
||||
message: 'All cherry-picks are good now, thank you!'
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
await github.graphql(`mutation($node_id:ID!) {
|
||||
minimizeComment(input: {
|
||||
classifier: RESOLVED,
|
||||
subjectId: $node_id
|
||||
})
|
||||
{ clientMutationId }
|
||||
}`, { node_id: review.node_id })
|
||||
})
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
- name: Log current API rate limits
|
||||
env:
|
||||
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user